← All case studies

Case 13 · Legal Services

From scattered onboarding evidence to a review-ready AML/CTF file.

Australian legal practices AML/CTF client & matter onboarding 25 October 2026

From scattered onboarding evidence to a review-ready AML/CTF file.

A new property matter is ready to open, but identity documents, ownership details, source-of-funds evidence and the purpose of the transaction arrive through several channels. The lawyer cannot safely proceed until the file is complete, assessed and approved.

Australian evidence: From 1 July 2026, Australian legal practices must have an AML/CTF program before providing designated professional services. AUSTRAC requires relevant practices to conduct customer due diligence, report certain matters and keep complete records—generally for seven years. View AUSTRAC's legal profession starter kit

Business friction

A matter cannot progress confidently when evidence and risk context are fragmented.

  • Identity, beneficial-owner and transaction records arrive through different channels
  • Staff repeatedly chase missing, expired or conflicting information
  • Risk indicators and approvals can be buried in email, forms and matter notes
Agentic AI response

A controlled readiness agent prepares evidence for authorised review.

  • Classify approved documents against the practice's matter checklist
  • Flag missing fields, inconsistencies and policy-defined risk indicators
  • Prepare a source-linked review pack and route exceptions to the right person
Human, legal & privacy control

AI organises evidence—authorised people make every legal and AML decision.

  • Never let AI accept a client, assign final risk or decide whether to report suspicion
  • Do not infer criminality from protected attributes or unsupported assumptions
  • Use secure systems, minimum data, source links, access controls and complete audit logs
Measures that prove value
Time to review-ready fileFirst-pass completenessFollow-ups per matterUnresolved exceptionsReview timeCorrections and overrides

Have a similar process bottleneck?

Start with the workflow—not the software.

Discuss this use case